That does make sense, Yaizh.
Perhaps it should just be requested that revamp threads be more constructive. The how discussions sound awesome, but I don't recall ever seeing revamp threads actually containing discussions like that. There could have been some, I just don't remember. So encouraging people to actually suggest additions, deletions, etc for revamps would be great.
I just don't see the point in people posting thread stating simply, "Drindians need a revamp." Artists always end up posting that they already know which pets need to be revamped. And they sometimes happen to be ones that the users are already attached to, such as the iluvu. But they still needed a revamp, so they got one. Thus, pets that require revamps will get them and those that do not will not. Artists decide that because they have the most knowledge of what Res style is supposed to look like. Threads simply stating which "need a revamp" are pointless.
Unless, of course, more specific suggestions for the revamp are made. That would be awesome.
I don't have a problem with not clicking on it, but I as.sume that staff members are supposed to comment on things like this. And there's no real need to repeat themselves. Which is why all the things on the "Topics not up for discussion" thread are there.
...I'm rambling again. -_-