More Hatches/Forest Exploration


Go to page: 1 Bookmark Thread
Tld

11:16pm Jan 8 2010

Normal User


Posts: 5,998
Don't stop me, but hasn't anyone felt that the number of Creatu hatches in one day is too little? And same the the number of times you can search for abandoned Creatu in the Forest. A bit too little. I don't want to clash with other virtual petsites, like Neopets and Marapets, but their pet adoptions are unlimited.



Raru

11:28pm Jan 8 2010

Normal User


Posts: 583

I think it's all juuust right |D

If you've been on the site for long you'll realise not a lot of the older users will support this idea. Time and time again it comes up but for economical (right word?) reasons we keep it the way it is really o3o





Yoshi

12:34am Jan 9 2010 (last edited on 12:35am Jan 9 2010)

Normal User


Posts: 3,642

Yah, economical. xD As always, it's supply and demand. Raising the hatch limit increases supply of pets, and more supply but same demand nearly always means less value.

Also, the forest search limit was already raised a while ago. It used to be only three. Perhaps you should be happy with five. ;o




SugarRush

12:43am Jan 9 2010

Normal User


Posts: 1,707
I agree...I'm perfectly happy with my one hatch aday but I always hatch natties D=<



C:
Nouveau

11:36am Jan 9 2010

Normal User


Posts: 2,962

I don't agree with this idea.  Sorry to ramble on about things that have already been said, but raising the number of hatches has the potential to be distastrous.  Think about it: If we raised the current Rancher hatching limit (Three hatches per day) even just by just a few more (Let's say not, that it's five), you will have a bigger chance to hatch a colored pet.  Now, this may seem good, but this will majorly decrease the value of colored pets, plunging our economy into deeper distress than it already is.  Make sense?

As for raising the number of forest searches, I agree with what Yoshi said.  It was recently raised, and I think that it's fine the way it is.

Sorry 'bout the rambling.  xD







Actively inactive. Formerly lolalover6.
Go to page: 1